Again, I direct you toward Evolutionary Theory. Organisms are granted three options when faced with a hostile environment: Move, Adapt or Die.
Extinction is never a viable option. Organisms have one genetic directive above all others: thrive. Any species which advocates, through word or action, giving up as a preferable course of action is intrinsically flawed and should rightly perish.
Movement is a temporary fix. If an environment becomes less than optimal, moving to a new one may ensure survival, but in a closed system, other species will eventually follow the first to the new location, thereby creating another less than optimal situation.
Adaptation: This is the fruit of Evolution's labor. To adapt is to rise above equals, setting ones' self at the genetic standard, in order to create offspring that can withstand the unpleasant situation, their their offspring may, in turn, subdue and reclaim the environment for their own. Then the vicious cycle begins again.
Many called the great Bonaparte mad. But I ask, how would you react if your obvious superiority were called into question, simply because you did not match the modal average of a given group?
Homo Sapiens are more numerous than Elevated Animals, Plants and Mutated Humans; I grant this. But the inferior must always outnumber the elite; else they would simply be peers.
Remember the words of Socrates, quoting his accusers: "All these rumors and and this talk about you would never have arisen if you had been like other men."
The great philosopher never would have met his death through cowardly execution (he was poisoned), had he conformed to the standards of the era. And had he done so, how long would Man's intellect been left to simply stagnate, until another great thinker came along? Unnatural Selection indeed.
-Brigadier S. Jack, Army of Bonaparte (Ret.)
No comments:
Post a Comment